It looks like you're going to burst a vein with this emotional tirade.
You haunted ProLife for weeks in regard to his mistaken belief of fetal heart beats. But, I'm not about to do the research for you and *prove* my case. After all, "haunted" is a subjective term and open to interpretation. Undoubtedly, an interpretation you would deny.
As to your quoted claim that I said "multiple and numerous threads." I ask you where I said that phrase? You simply made it up. Did I use those words. Yes, but what you've done is put two separately spoken words together, formed a phrase out of it, and altered the context in the process. Not only that, but you've taken it one step further and falsely claimed I *quoted* it. Here's the post for *proof*.
Message 15863021
Talk about a dishonest posting techniques. That one has to take the cake!
Now, let me do an E here and go on and on about it the way you love to do....LOL
Did you falsely quote that phrase from me on purpose in order to perpetuate a lie? Or did you simply become confused while answering my posts and missed the fact that it came from different sentences of a post. Because, when you quote someone, that means they said it, in that exact way.
Was it your intention to mislead those reading this thread that I actually quoted that phrase?
Really E, I want to know this, others might want to know also.
Can you understand how quoting a phrase from someone when they've never spoken it, can lead to all kinds of false images? Or, do you believe misquoting someone is ok, as long as the words are contained within the quote? Really, which is it E? Is misquoting someone ok in your mind as a technique to be used in a disagreement. Because, if misquoting someone is ok. I could simply find two words contained in your post and then put them together to mean anything and everything.
Shall we all do this E? Shall we all just make up phrases from two seperately spoken words of a post, and then argue about the merits of the phrase.
hmm, that could lead to all kinds of interesting dialogues. Let's see if I can find a few words in your last post and put them together in a quote the way you did.
"The budget is impossible to balance"
Wow! Do you really believe that E? Do you really believe the budget is impossible to balance? After all, you said each and every one of those words in this post. And the words individually have been spoken by you. So, using your new clever technique of quoting, I've done it the E way. What do you think E? LOL
Now, will you show me where I quoted that phrase? Of course not, because you just made it up. It's an E made up quote, placed in quotes under the misguided assumption that someone won't go back and check it. Well, here you are E, caught in a misquote. Using your definition.. Caught in a lie. How will you respond, will you admit you misquoted me, or will you instead obfuscate and evade?
To answer your previous question. I noticed you posted the article on *two* separate threads and at least *three*" exerps of the article on this thread.
Is that multiple? Is that numerous?
Just depends on your definition of *is* doesn't it E? LOL |
