SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Laughter is the Best Medicine - Tell us a joke

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Pami who wrote (2667)6/22/1997 2:22:00 PM
From: Janice Shell   of 62549
 
Pam--

Needless to say, that was not the way I worked it out. My reasoning, such as it was: JJJ had to be either 333, 666, or 999. Since JJJ had also to be the sum of three three-digit figures, none of which had a leading zero, it was most likely 999. Therefore one simply had to set up three columns of three-digit figures comprised of 1-8 and zero, which, added up, would come to 999. It's immediately obvious that there are too many high numbers to work out a scheme in which all three columns add up to 9, so one must, then, use 8,7, and 4 to give you a 19 in the first column to the right, then a 5, 0, and 3 (plus one carried) in the middle column, and finally 6, 1, and 2. Of course the numbers, considered as part of vertical columns, may be in any order.

A mathematician would be appalled. Not sure it makes sense even to me anymore.

Janice
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext