I repeat: Show me any posting that establishes that I sold NCF short at 10.80 and covered at 14.80.
------------ Having problem with the english language. My post did not say that you bought at 10.80 and sold at 14.80. It said in that range when the price went from 10.80 to 14.80 you shorted. That is FACT. You also gave no indication of what your buy -sell prices were and your real losses. The ball is in your court to produce those numbers. If you don't then my assertion that your losses which are fact COULD BE AS HIGH AS 40%. """"""""STANDS """"""""----------------------
Fact of the matter is that you can't, because you're a lying POS.
----------- The lies are all from you. You show no superior returns, no evidence of such, and no willingness to produce any. PROVE ME WRONG AT LEAST ON THIS IF YOU CAN. Tell us what your losses were in that instance. ---------------------
Just link the post(s) in your response, without your usual 4 paragraphs of egotistical nonsense.
------------ Unlike your one line statements of BS. Real information real fact real data and real backup take space. I have provided links to what you requested in past postings you or anyone can check that here is one such so again ignore and disregard the obvious
Message 16798083
it gives details from past postings going back to # 46 -------------------------------------------
While you're at it why don't you post your position at May 15 and your position today?
---------- The links of my positions and holdings were given on several occassions as attested by the link from one who has followed them and reached his own conclusions which I linked to in my last post to you. Its the same from you. Your refusal to accept them and denial of their existence is just laughable. OR ARE YOU REALLY THAT LAME. Do you really believe that no one else is realizing this??????? GET REAL. -----------------------
As a sop to your position that unrealized losses aren't really losses, you don't have to admit any losses; just post your positions and everyone can make their own call as to how you have done.
--------- I have already laid to rest the position of unrealized and realized and it is supported by REVENUE CANADA a point that you yourself made. I and others take their word about the issue above yours any day. ------- As with the link I gave in my last post from a reader here. Everyone who is not in denial of the facts has already made their call as his own link has shown. Or do you deny that as well. OF COURSE YOU DO THATS YOUR TRADEMARK And it doesn't show you in a good light ---------------------------
Interesting to see that you claim never ever to have had a realized loss. That means that every stock you've ever bought has gone up or you're still holding it. How long have you been investing? Just curious
---------- We have not been talking here of every stock I have ever bought and you know that. Nice try though. We are talking about the trusts. And in that area , the trusts, I am still holding. Accumulating. Because that has been my method which I illustrated fully. And as I have said before it is going on near 2 decades. As to investing in general from a teenager say about another decade maybe less. In the time from teenager to the trusts I was mostly in mutual funds dollar cost averaging (DCA) monthly. Then I started exploring my method first applying it to when to average in funds , since number crunching with real data I was doing at the time , showed monthly was not the most beneficial. Years of doing that and showing better results than just with DCA. I decided to apply my method to stocks. The time and effort involved with that proved more than I cared to continue to spend. So as I noticed that my trusts which I had at that time just recently got into were performing very well with next to no effort on my part. I then decided it was far better to put my time and effort into other areas (of more personal pursuits). I over the next while tuned my method to as you see it today ( # 1998) with the trusts. As to losses with my endeavor with stocks I admit there were some. Nothing catastrophic as I was using at the time a strategy a method , a plan. Unlike your calls to joe average here of just go do it (trade) with no method no plan and you'll get superior returns because it is just that easy. Well because of my own first hand experience, it is not easy, it takes a lot of work ,a lot of effort ,and a lot of time, to get results. And these things joe just doesn't have or do. And that is why for him it is always a disaster. So again lay off the con job and I won't have to show it as such. |
