SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : MANIPULATION IS RAMPANT --- Can We Stop It?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Dave Gore who wrote (278)5/24/2002 6:00:30 PM
From: id  Read Replies (2) of 589
 
here is an interesting snippet from:

usagold.com

The Securities and Exchange Commission may not be as sleepy as it's looked lately. Outmaneuvered by savvy New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer, who wrestled Merrill Lynch into a $100 million settlement to drop charges against its two-faced analysts, the SEC has a score to settle. And analysts could soon feel the brunt of SEC ire.

The SEC's enforcement group is looking at analysts who traded against their own recommendations, a top flight legal eagle and securities law professor said. The SEC began a formal inquiry into market practices concerning analysts' conflicts of interest on April 25 and sources familiar with the agency say that analysts' trading practices are in the cross-hairs. "Analysts who recommend a stock and then dumped their own shares could be brought up under anti-fraud provisions," explained Coffee.

Analysts trading for their own accounts contrary to their recommendations - for example, selling shares or shorting shares when they publicly gave the company the highest ratings - were discovered by the SEC during an initial inquiry into analysts' conflicts conducted last summer by then acting-SEC commissioner Laura Unger.

id
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext