Did Mr. Gore speak for you in this?
If the Taliban were a fifth-rate military power, why didn't the Clinton-Gore administration destroy it and spare us Sept. 11?
It is not as if, during Gore's term, al Qaeda had not declared itself or established its postal address. It declared war on the United States, blew up our embassies in Kenya and Tanzania and attacked the USS Cole. What did Gore's administration do? Fire a few missiles into the Afghan desert and a Sudanese pharmaceutical factory, then wash its hands and leave the problem to its successors.
Why didn't the Clinton-Gore administration go after this fifth-rate military power? This is a question that even Russian President Vladimir Putin has asked. In an interview with the German newspaper Bild shortly after Sept. 11, Putin recounted having talked to the Clinton administration about Osama bin Laden: "They wrung their hands so helplessly and said, 'The Taliban are not turning him over, what can one do?' I remember I was surprised: If they are not turning him over, one has to think and do something."
As was pointed out later, the Clinton-Gore crime family, the one that hated their betters, those men in uniform who were not allowed to wear those uniforms in the White House (you know, that public residence the crime family was operating as a very expensive private inn), understood one use of those uniforms: When they sound of the baying hounds reached an intensity that indicated the crime family was in danger of incarceration, they sent those uniforms out to get killed.
Does Gore speak for you in that?
Thank God for those confused refugees from Elderhostel in Florida. |
