SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : My House
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Poet who wrote (2042)10/3/2002 1:32:57 PM
From: Original Mad Dog  Read Replies (1) of 7689
 
The first was reported in the press I am pretty sure.

The second is my own supposition based on the fact that the state supreme court justices have party affiliations and the majority are Democrats. They were construing a statute that said 50-something days and they basically said it didn't matter....and those who may have already voted will just have to vote again, I guess. They should have just told the Dems to stick with their original choice and ride it out. The guy's not dead or bedridden with disease....he just figured he was gonna lose. The statute is there to prevent both parties from doing that.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News