SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Current Events and General Interest Bits & Pieces

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Condor who wrote (92)11/21/2002 9:43:29 PM
From: Win Smith  Read Replies (1) of 603
 
This is an odd story. I'll have to watch for something with a little more depth than the wire service coverage. I'm not entirely sure what distinguishes this from conventional genetic engineering. Then there's this.

The goal, said Venter, is to build a bacterium that is capable of making hydrogen that could be used for fuel, or to develop a microbe that could absorb and store carbon dioxide, thus removing a surplus of that greenhouse gas from the atmosphere.

Well, the first one would be cool and everything, though there are industrial processes. The second one sort of sounds like photosynthesis. Which has only been around for a few billion years. A more conventional techno-fix approach on that front that's been kicking around a while:

Study: Iron dumped in ocean increases greenhouse gas-eating algae cnn.com

Ocean fertilization yields hope, uncertainty for global warming cnn.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext