SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Current Events and General Interest Bits & Pieces

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Win Smith who wrote (424)2/4/2003 2:27:14 PM
From: Elsewhere  Read Replies (2) of 603
 
Well, the US defense budget is sort of an unfair point of comparison

Just found a similar one in a WSJ article:

Shuttle Crash Raises Questions Over Future of Manned Flights
Already Facing Steep Budget Cutbacks, NASA May Reassess Ultimate Mission
The Wall Street Journal February 3, 2003 6:26 p.m. EST
online.wsj.com

<Initially the shuttle was part of NASA's dream to send people regularly into space and eventually to Mars. For all practical purposes, it has become a vehicle for trips to the not-yet-completed International Space Station and for science experiments in a weightless environment. The nation's only manned space program has shrunk along with NASA's budget, which at about $14 billion is less than 1% of the national budget. That is tiny compared to the Pentagon's $294 billion budget in 2001.>

The article also contains a chart of the percentage of the NASA budget vs. total federal outlays.

Some pro-ISS arguments:

ISS: Improving Life on Earth and in Space
The NASA Research Plan, An Overview
spaceflight.nasa.gov

A detailed evaluation:

ISS Management and Cost Evaluation (IMCE) task force report
November 1, 2001
ftp://ftp.hq.nasa.gov/pub/pao/reports/2001/imce.pdf
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext