Yawn.
It said that the U.S. had USED a forged document in a vain effort to make its case against Iraq for harboring nuclear weapons.
You still just don't get it - unsurprisingly.
Where's the IAEA's evidence, then, showing that the document used by the U.S., et al., was forged?
Ironically, you've used the words "propaganda" and "parroting": your resistance to supporting (via any sort of evidence) these wild claims of conspiracies is only different from those you accuse in the angle it comes from.
And as for the rest of your post...while most of it amounts to a difference of opinion (a moot one, at that, as bombs and cruise missiles are falling at this moment), with respect to this line...
Next thing you know, the U.S. will plant some biological weapons in Iraq, "discover" them, and then say, "You see, we found chemical weapons[...]
ROFL. Congratulations, you're the first contestant!
Message 18721352
LPS5 |
