SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: lurqer who wrote (23262)7/25/2003 1:48:31 AM
From: Sully-   of 89467
 
Thanks for providing irrefutable evidence that media
outlets do lie & repeat lies just like your favorite
politicians.......<see the following>

Message 19144949

Then see.....

<font size=4>
How Many More Lies Lie Ahead?

A new DNC hit piece in the form of a television campaign ad relates the following information in typewritten words across the screen. "In his State of the Union address George W. Bush told us of an imminent threat..."

Right off the bat we are confronted with one huge whopper of a lie, because George W. Bush never mentioned an "imminent threat" posed by Iraq at any time during his State of the Union (S.O.U.) address. In fact, the foundation of the Bush doctrine of preemptive strikes is that we should undertake them BEFORE an enemy's threat becomes imminent.
<font size=3>
americandaily.com
____________________________________________________________
Times-Ledger
Boro pols call for inquiry into handling of Iraq info
<font size=4>
Congresswoman Carolyn Maloney (D-Astoria) said,
“If the Congress was intentionally misled on the issue of Iraq’s imminent threat to the U.S., I would regret my vote,” she said in a prepared statement. “The serious questions that continue to emerge about these issues should only be fully explored and resolved in a special inquiry, where the officials involved can present testimony and answer questions that the public deserves to know.”
<font size=3>
timesledger.com
____________________________________________________________
<font size=4>
Paul Krugman

Who's Unpatriotic Now?

Some nonrevisionist history: On Oct. 8, 2002, Knight Ridder newspapers reported on intelligence officials who "charge that the administration squelches dissenting views, and that intelligence analysts are under intense pressure to produce reports supporting the White House's argument that Saddam poses such an immediate threat to the United States that pre-emptive military action is necessary.".....

.....Issues of principle aside, the invasion of a country that hadn't attacked us and didn't pose an imminent threat has seriously weakened our military position......

(c) 2003 New York Times News Service<font size=3>
fcnp.com

____________________________________________________________
<font size=4>

BUSH CALLS IRAQ IMMINENT THREAT
Source: Los Angeles Times, January 29, 2003

THE STATE OF THE UNION ADDRESS
ph.ucla.edu
__________________________________________________________

CBC News Canada'a Perspective
Looking through the fog
<font size=4>
"Bush claimed that Iraq posed an imminent threat to the U.S."<font size=3>
cbc.ca
___________________________________________________________

No solid proof yet linking Saddam Hussein to Al-Qaeda
Agence France-Presse
Washington, July 25

Iraq posed an imminent threat to US security because Saddam could provide Al-Qaeda with the feared chemical, biological or nuclear "weapons of mass destruction," US officials said in the months leading up to the war.

hindustantimes.com
____________________________________________________________
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext