But "asked and answered" is certainly not an intelligent answer.
I disagree. However, here is a snowflake for you. It rests on top of the tip of the iceburg.
Message 19161880
Solon: So if you do not wish to discuss the origin of these codes--no problem.
siliconinvestor.com
Answer: I do not allow my self to get into debates about beliefs. They are unproductive, irresolvable, and generally bring more hypocrisy out of people than genuine expressions or insights regarding belief.
siliconinvestor.com.
your question has only to do with the supernatural buggieman you compulsively see behind every bush. It has no other claim to the context of this discussion. Beliefs in origins is another argument.
siliconinvestor.com.
No, this is yet another solonism. If this is what I was arguing I would have said so.
Message 19157928
This is not my belief, not my claim, never stated by me as anything, does not follow the logic of my argument.
Message 19146260
I have stated nothing about origins. This is ALL you and pervasive throughout the many pages of discourse on this topic.
Message 19142711
My position is not the either or position that you suggest (and credit to me) and has not been from the beginning of this discussion.
siliconinvestor.com.
"MY OPINION IS AN ABSOLUTE MORAL VALUE" scenario!
Not once, not ever....in fact, and quite to the contrary, I have refuted every attempt you have made to suggest that any human beings opinion can be absolute in any way (something that you continually attribute to me)... so many, many, many times that your statement is mind boggling.
Message 19154534
This is all I have been arguing over the proliferation for days and days of you trying to grind something else out of it. When we had accomplished this fairly early on, I declared that I thought we were done.
Message 19133878
I don't find that interesting so I guess we are done.
Message 19123406
“Moral Truism”? Is that the same as saying it exists in the realm of absolute ideals? If so, why quibble. We are done. |
