SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : SI vs. iHub - Battle of the Boards Part 2

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: SI Bob who wrote (4776)9/4/2003 12:29:07 PM
From: Bux  Read Replies (1) of 5315
 
It seems we are in substantial agreement, I wish I could say the same with regard to Matt. However, you seem to have believe that I was the one who cut off communication. To be clear, that was Matt. I'm looking at a chronological copy of our communication right now. Even after Matt became verbally abusive I continued to try to make my case politely and respectfully using new evidence and examples. He said he wasn't interested.

That's when I took the issue public. I find that pretty odd behavior coming from an "administrator" who has already acknowledged it should have only been a 15 minute suspension.

In hindsight, the only thing I could have done differently was to admit to the kangaroo charge that I was attacking Jim Lurgio. I'm not willing to lie in order to have my lifetime membership reinstated. I was willing to discuss it like mature adults but that was not possible with Matt.

Now that Matt has admitted to holding me on a shorter leash than other paying customers (and proving it beyond a reasonable doubt) I'm not even sure I want to participate under such lopsided rules. I may be too trusting and foolish for having purchased a lifetime membership from such an outfit but I'm not a complete idiot.

Once
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext