Here is what you said, Buddy:
"if you argue such a wishy-washy concept as 'natural requirements', you must at least attempt to list a few of these supposed requirements,"
Message 20223302
In response, I gave you a few of them by saying,
"Eating living things is one of them. Logical sexual heterogeny is another, and there is not anything wishy-washy about either."
siliconinvestor.com
Now, rather than apply the concept of practical conservatism, as I have briefly explained it, to these natural requirements, you, like an absolute idiot, asked in ridicule,
"'Eating living things' (like the carrot in my refrigerator?) is WHAT??????? 'Conservative' or 'Liberal'??????"
siliconinvestor.com
In response to this flatulent stupidity (I should have just said nothing), I clarified by saying that,
"It is one of those alleged "wishy-washy" natural requirements you were lying about."
siliconinvestor.com
And now you are claiming I never answered the question when I in fact certainly did. You are just not listening. I think you are being dishonest, and if not dishonest, you're an idiot. But I think you are being dishonest, as is always the case with leftists. I am trying to give you the benefit of the doubt here. Of course, it is probably best to be an idiot than dishonest. |
