"you didn't make any mention as to what you thought the wire was under Bush's tie"
Actually I did. I said, "Let's assume for a second that
this alleged wire was connected to the alleged
communications device." And I said that for good reason.
I had seen that site prior to Suma mentioning it. Since "the
bulge" never became a serious issue I viewed this site with
extreme scepticism. The internet is chock full of sites
proclaiming to "prove" some vast conspiracy. Many of these
sites actually do a decent job of presenting their case, yet
almost all of them are completely bogus.
It is so easy to alter pictures on the internet. Anyone with
the desire to invent an alternate reality with pictures can
easily do it. All you need is a computer and any cheap
photoshop software. Some computers now come with the
necessary software already on it or on a free disk for you to
load at your leisure.
I have at least three such programs available to me, none of
which I paid for. Imagine what you could do with a good
photoshop software package.
Still, the site in question has a couple of pictures where
they claim show a wire near Bush's tie. And sure enough the
pictures seem to show one.
That proves nothing to me. They could be altered. And even if
there was a wire, so what? More on this below.
"I am curious as to what you think that wire under his tie was for."
Well, I'm not even sure that Bush wore a wire that was
visible during the debates. Just because that site purports
to show one is not proof that one exists (as noted above).
In any event, I'll entertain the thought that a wire was
present. I'll do the same for the bulge being some sort of
wireless communications device.
What purpose would the alleged wire serve?
What purpose would the alleged communications device serve?
There was no ear piece, wireless or otherwise. Anyone who
clicked through on the purported pictures of the ear piece
can see for themselves that the photo on the right manually
highlighted a piece of flesh from Bush's ear & falsely
claimed it showed an ear piece. Unfortunately, both the photo
on the left & the one on the right showed there was no ear
piece, wireless or otherwise. That much is painfully obvious.
The photo on the right was obviously altered as I have
already explained in a previous post.
Message 21095747
However, even if you somehow believe an earpiece was visible,
then why was there any need for a communications device or a
wire? The ear piece would have to be a wireless device (since
there is absolutely no evidence of any wire leading to Bush's
ear).
Why would Bush need to wear a wireless communications device
on his back if the ear piece was also wireless ?
The alleged communications device on his back had to be
wireless (since there was no external wire attached to Bush
visible at any of the debates). Why then would Bush have
needed a wire near/under his tie? Wouldn't a wire be
superfluous for a wireless communication device?
And for that matter, wouldn't a wireless communication device
be superfluous on Bush's back if the (non-existent) ear piece
was wireless (as JBC already pointed out in this debate)?
If this site & all the others purporting to establish
that "the bulge" proves Bush cheated in the debates; why has
no major MSM outlet gone public with their own detailed
investigative reports on the matter?
The MSM went after Bush with all manner of bogus, distorted,
intentionally misleading & hyper exaggerated stories. If this
site really has the goods, why was the MSM virtually silent
on the matter?
I believe the answer is self evident. |
