SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Ilaine who wrote (61882)4/16/2005 5:15:29 AM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) of 74559
 
Hello CB, You have in fact not asked me this question Message 21230709

<<I've been asking ... JAY Chen, etc., "so, when is CHINA going to apologize for invading Tibet, Korea and Vietnam?"

No response . . . .

Wonder why that is?>>


Wonder no more, the answer is in fact you have not asked me this question, have you?

In the event that you want to ask me this question, I would simply turn around the question, and comment ...

(a) Tibet was never ever a sovereign state, and is no more foreign to China than is Hawaii foreign to the USA;

(b) Korea? why should China apologize, for what, for saving the N.Koreans from the S.Koreans and the Americans?

(c) Vietnam? China will likely apologize as soon as the US apologizes.

The level of history learning is not the best in the nature of the questions, or the motivations are not pure.

<<Mq has a better one, "so, are you going to apologize in advance before you invade Taiwan?">>

To which a possible Yankee response would be (a) invasion can only happen be by one country of another, and (b) as in the case of the US civil war, the North simply guarded the integrity of the Consitution by doing whatever to the South. No?

I guess, as in the case of all history, it is all very selective, and much of it is Just Is. BWDIK.

I just thought you are above in claiming to have asked me something that you in fact had not.

In the meantime, our actual discussion stands thus
Message 21226285

Chugs, Jay
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext