Should God be replaced? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Solon who wrote (20547)	6/21/2005 1:49:16 PM
From: Greg or e	Read Replies (1) of 28931

"I have never said the fetus was simply an egg" Message 21339696 You have, and continue to use this false terminology to obscure the fact that the Zygote is no longer "simply an egg" but is a new and unique individual Human Being, genetically distinct from the mother. "Individuals are not "defined" into existence." Correct, they come into existence (as a matter of scientific fact) when sperm and egg combine to create a new Person. These "individual" persons are cannot be defined out of existence any more than they can be defined into existence. Their "inalienable rights" stem from their Humanness and must therefore be taken into account by others including the mother who's actions may affect the life of the unborn person in the same way that the mother must limit her actions to preserve and protect her older children. What about Siamese Twins; are they incapable of possessing inalienable rights? Any parent is obliged to feed protect and "keep" their child alive. Are they also deprived of inalienable rights?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next