SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Oil Sands and Related Stocks

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: robnhood who wrote (12606)9/24/2006 11:20:45 AM
From: The Vet  Read Replies (1) of 25575
 
First robnhood's link

<< Dubya ratings VS gasoline price

usatoday.com
>>

And then some unrelated news....

Just a coincidence I am sure! LOL....

courtesy siempre33 at the kitco refugee site
voy.com


Goldman's revision of commodity index caused plunge in gasoline prices -- siempre33 (), 00:16:32 09/24/06 Sun

From The King Report
By William J. King
Friday, September 22, 2006

mramseyking.com

In yesterday's Wall Street Journal, Section C, there is a very interesting item in the article headlined "Some Investors Lose Their Zest For Commodities." The article notes that over that past few months, commodity funds have been liquidating commodity holdings. But here's the stunner: "Consider the Goldman Sachs commodity index, one of the most popular vehicles for betting on raw materials. In July, Goldman Sachs tweaked the index's content by cutting its exposure to gasoline. Investors tracking the index had to adjust their portfolios accordingly -- which sent gasoline futures prices tumbling."

Prior to Goldman's revision of the Goldman Sachs Commodity Index in July, unleaded gas accounted for 8.45% (dollar weighting) of the GSCI.

chinese-school.netfirms.com.

Now unleaded gas is only 2.30%.

www2.goldmansachs.com

This means that commodity funds had to sell 73% of their gasoline futures to conform to the reformulated GSCI.

But it wasn't only commodity funds that were forced to sell. Goldman's decision to lower the weighting of unleaded gasoline in its commodity index and NOT to roll any portion of the GSCI attributable to New York Harbor unleaded gasoline created problems for arbitrageurs and commercial traders as well.

Here is the Goldman press release:

"On July 12, 2006 Goldman, Sachs & Co. announced that, for the roll occurring in September 2006 (the September Roll) in relation to the Goldman Sachs Commodity Index (GSCI) futures contract expiring in October 2006, it would roll the existing portion of the GSCI that is attributable to the Reformulated Gasoline Blendstock for Oxygen Blending (RB) futures contract on the New York Mercantile Exchange but would not roll any portion of the GSCI that is attributable to the New York Harbor Unleaded Gasoline contract (HU) contract into the RB contract."

www2.goldmansachs.com

Goldman's changes probably induced arbs, commercial hedgers, and other traders to sell September and October unleaded gasoline future contracts to avoid possible (settlement, delivery, etc.) problems.

September futures expired in August; October contracts expire September 29. So unleaded gasoline prices collapsed in August and September.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext