New FADG. Message Board - Msg: 23650574

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : New FADG.

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Sam who wrote (1896)	6/25/2007 12:46:35 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (2) of 4152

My most likely outcome is straight project of what we NOW know the parties involved were doing in 2000 - 2003. It doesn't involve anybody changing course. We already knew that sanctions were crumbling and we couldn't get them renewed. But we know a lot now, because of the invasion, that we didn't know then. We NOW know how much oil-for-food money went to bribe the French and Russians, and to what good effect. We NOW know about AQ Khan's Sam's Club for nukes. We NOW know about the North Korean nuclear program and their eagerness to sell anything to anybody with cash. And in case that didn't work, we also NOW know that Saddam's chief nuclear scientist had a centrifuge buried in his back garden. Add this up, what sum do you get? Saddam minding his own business? Not his style. Maybe he would have waited until he had the bomb ready this time. He did say, in one of his more rational moments, that his big mistake was invading Kuwait before he had a nuclear weapon.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next