Yawn
Let's see. You're an elitist, Nanny state gov't, tax & spend socialist/liberal who wants to have the gov't impose your socialist values upon we peons by fiat. Uh huh, check.
That would explain why you said why "we" should be spending more on infrastructure. Uh huh, check.
In the post in question (linked below) you said that infrastructure is more important than the "WOT". That would be the same "WOT" you have repeatedly blamed Bush for causing all of our ills. Uh huh, check.
You also brought up Katrina. That would be the same Katrina you repeatedly blamed Bush for causing all of our ills. Uh huh, check.
Then you said, "Anyway, if we continue to spend our money stupidly on places like Iraq, and fail to rebuild our own country, I suggest we'll be seeing a lot more stories like the one below" (bridge collapse story). That would be the same Iraq you have repeatedly blamed Bush for causing all of our ills. Uh huh, check.
So the same "we" that represents your Nanny state gov't, tax & spend socialist/liberal gov't just happens to be the same "we" "stupidly" spending money on Iraq, the same "we" screwing up Katrina & the same "we" making the world a more dangerous place for fighting the WOT. Uh huh, check.
The only difference is that when you talk abot the "we" gov't of your Nanny state fantasies, there is no derision & when that "we" gov't refers to the one run by Bush, the name calling, blame & derision are ever present. Uh huh, check.
I rest my case.
Message 23755226 |
