Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)

AMD 231.94

+0.1%

Jan 20 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: muzosi who wrote (252964)	6/6/2008 7:21:54 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (1) of 275872

Muzosi, > in case you haven't noticed no one is insulting bob here. Message 24654522 > From a biased Intel employee ? I'll pass and anyway Intel Architects have already distinguished themselves with Pentium 4 and Itanium 1 ;-). This was in response to my statement that the question of L1 latency is grad school stuff. > it's also another kind of idiot who support the ideas of other people who long ago dropped them. obviously a 10g cpu ... You can stop right there. The original debate was over L1 cache latency, not 10 GHz. Anyway, Intel has long ago moved on from the race to 10 GHz, like you pointed out. No one is claiming that Intel's architects are all-knowing, but Mas thinks P4 and Merced qualifies him to be an expert on computer architecture. I don't think Mas is even qualified to teach a grad school course on the subject, much less criticize the decision to increase the L1 cache latency on Intel's Nehalem processor. Tenchusatsu

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next