SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Bonds & Bond Funds

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: peter michaelson12/17/2008 8:27:01 PM
   of 161
 
interesting post copied from Morningstar board.
socialize.morningstar.com

Re: PIMCO Muni CEFs - What's Wrong
jagor 12-15-2008, 11:13 AM | Post #2604713 0
Mariana Bush of Wachovia Securities, one of the savviest experts currrently writing on closed-end funds, gives a pretty good explanation of what happened to the Pimco muni CEF's and what caused them to suspend dividends.

It's in her Closed-end Fund Monthly Report for November 2008. Apparently there are two main reasons: (1) the Pimco funds [along with Eaton Vance, VanKampen, DWS and Eaton Vance] are the most highly-leveraged and thus are at greater risk of deleveraging if the municipal market weakens, and (2) Pimco followed the practice of shorting Treasurys to reduce the interest-rate senstitivty, a strategy that worked against the portfolios as Treasurys rose.

On the other hand, Mariana Bush states that Nuveen "anticipated deleveraging challenges ahead of its time and earlier than others [and] is probably more cautious" than some of its competitors.

I notice that NUV, which I own, which is unleveraged and holds only investment grade munis, is only down -11% YTD, is selling at a discount of just -1% and is yielding 5.5% tax-free. That's about as good as you can get these days.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext