SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Kirk's Market Thoughts
COHR 191.04-2.5%Jan 16 9:30 AM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: rdkflorida2 who wrote (3794)2/8/2016 12:30:17 PM
From: Kirk ©1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Investor Clouseau

  Read Replies (1) of 27046
 
Of course the GOP was for it. That is why the democrats opposed it but notice both houses signed the bill AFTER he took office. He used his "good will" period after the election to move forward a GOP proposal and PUSH enough democrats for it to pass in both houses to sign it. It was one of several reasons many of us moderates liked him.

I am not arguing if it was a good or bad thing. I'm just saying NAFTA would have NEVER passed with him in office if he not only pushed democrats to sign the bill then sign the final law when it came to his desk.

Hell, the house and senate might have bills now to eliminate ACA which even Obama now calls "Obamacare" but they don't get anywhere because the president vetos the bills and the GOP doesn't have enough votes to override a veto.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News