SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Driverless autos, trucks, taxis etc.

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: Sam5/4/2017 11:33:35 AM
  Read Replies (1) of 567
 
Google just accused Uber of creating a fake, shell company with its former engineer to steal its tech

Biz Carson
22h

SAN FRANCISCO — Google accused rival Uber of plotting a devious "cover-up scheme" with a former Google engineer to steal crucial self-driving-car technology, a bombshell claim that turned up the heat in what has become Silicon Valley's most high-profile legal battle in years.

In a court hearing here on Wednesday, Google's attorneys sought to portray Otto, the startup company founded by the former engineer, as nothing more than a front company designed to help Uber catch up in the highly competitive self-driving-car field.

Uber acquired Otto in August, but according to Google's lawyers, Otto was never meant to operate as a real business. Anthony Levandowski, the engineer who left Google and founded Otto, planned all along to go to Uber, Google alleged. In fact, Uber gave Levandowski $250 million in stock the day after he quit Google in January 2016, lawyers said in court. (An Uber representative later told reporters that it was a document from August and simply back-dated for time served.)

"Through discovery, we've learned that Uber and Levandowski created a cover-up scheme for what they were doing," said Charles Verhoeven, an attorney for Waymo, Google's self-driving-car spinoff. "They concocted a story for public consumption."

The hearing on Wednesday is the opening round of a legal battle between two of Silicon Valley's tech superpowers, each trying to establish supremacy in the nascent market for self-driving-car technology.

At stake is a market that could one day be worth tens of billions of dollars and upend everything from the automotive industry to the fast-growing ride-hailing business that Uber has pioneered to become the world's most valuable private tech company.

A lot of money and a brilliant guyThe allegation that Uber conspired to build a company before acquiring it is a large part of Waymo's bid to stop Uber's research on self-driving cars.

Waymo alleges that in 2015, Levandowski downloaded more than 14,000 files — 9.7 gigabytes of data — containing information about the company's self-driving-car technology to his laptop and transferred those files to an external storage device. Those files included plans for Waymo's proprietary lidar system, according to the company. Lidar is the key piece of technology in self-driving cars that allows them to "see" what's ahead on the road.

His new company, Otto, was acquired by Uber more than six months later.

Judge William Alsup pushed back on Waymo's claims and asked whether Uber could be innocent. He said that maybe the "worst thing they did is pay a lot of money to hire away a brilliant guy from another competitor."

"Here's the thing," Alsup said. "You didn't sue him. You sued Uber. So what if it turns out that Uber is totally innocent?"

continues at businessinsider.com

[My note: People aren't allowed to keep a stolen good even if they didn't know it was stolen when [even if] they got possession of it legitimately. Companies are people [lol], they should not be allowed to use fruit of the poisoned tree either.]
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext