ACMI - Accumed Inc. Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : ACMI - Accumed Inc.

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: george who wrote (1051)	1/10/1998 12:51:00 PM
From: Sigmund	Read Replies (3) of 1894

You may be right but this has been said throughout industry commerce and other areas of social activity from the start of the information technology revolution. And quite frankly it really doesn't make much sense. I am not saying that the existing automated screening products are good enough. That is up to the FDA to decide. But we certainly know about the fallibility of people. They get tired, they are not all as good or motivated as each other so the patient gets the luck of the draw. Even in chess the computer ultimately beat the human. It is destined to happen in diagnostics. Whether it is here today remains to be determined but to think that it ultimately won't happen is shortsighted. The trick is to use the computer in ways that people get to do their part where they are most effective and economically justified. This often requires a reorganization of the way things are done. Thus I tend to agree with you that simply replacing people with machines is not the best solution. But you can't just keep the existing primary/secondary model and think that this is the way to assess where automation will fit in in the long run. In IT sometimes the long run is measured in months. Back to humans. My girlfriend is a lab director for a generalized lab. She used to be a hematology supervisor. She had someone working as a tech and she wondered about him. After a while she figured out that he was rather blind. He could run the tests (could read the digital displays) but screwed up on the set up and quality control or something like that. I imagine that some cytotechs have better vision than others and for all of us our vision varies from day to day and moment to moment. Try the same vision test when you have the flu. Do labs send cytotechs home when they have the flu? when they partied all night? do they give them an alcohol or drug test each day before they are allowed to read a slide? Do they have to report each day on what medications they are taking? How about if they just broke up with their significant other? Or if they are thinking about the stock market etc etc. Let's be realistic about the virtues of human beings as sensors. I don't think that ACMI depends on primary screening not being approved. I think that ACMI will do even better if primary screening is approved. The problem with AutoPap and other such devices is that they only do the test and they are very expensive. Small and medium sized labs will not be able to afford them and for the large labs, it doesn't make much sense to have such an expensive machine (even if you are paying per test) if you don't automate the entire process around the machine i.e. record keeping, reporting, facilitating the work of the techs on the slides which are not elimated by the automated screening etc. I think the future of ACMI is as part of a more comprehensive and integrated system which includes primary screening and which utilizes a smaller number of better trained and even better paid technologists to greatly improve the accuracy of Pap screening and other diagnostic tests. Progress will happen and ACMI will be part of the overall solution. It will not be ACMI in the absence of progress elsewhere in the lab.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next