SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
ACMI - Accumed Inc.
An SI Board Since January 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1894 4 0
Emcee:  Paul Bonarski Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
I've recently noticed Accumed during my travels. In the First Call Earnings Estimates 4 brokers give this stock a 1.0 rating (buy). Does anyone follow this one?
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1894 Greetings fellow posters. Been a while, huh? I had to back out quite a while XaviarCane-12/14/1999
1893 I found the answer on Yahoo The answer is not SAVANT - it is MEA. If you researbocaone-11/13/1999
1892 What do y'all make of this??? ----- Asensio: ParkerVision's Ferraro/Gtupac-10/15/1999
1891 What do you make of the press release today? Long term good news ACMI, bad newCisco-8/11/1999
1890 Interesting also is the sudden activity in BLBN last week. The bid doubled (ofchalu2-5/22/1999
1889 May 13, 1999 10:43 AccuMed Reports Increase in First Quarter Earnings CHICAGOtupac-5/13/1999
1888 Thanks, I got that earlier this morning. BTW, look at SCPI! WOW BRSteve-4/15/1999
1887 AccuMed International Announces Award of U.S. Patent for Automated DFrank Buck-4/15/1999
1886 Frank: Year end results for 1998 are out, reporting a net loss of $1.61/sh vBRSteve-4/2/1999
1885 <i>"what do you make of this? He must see some opportunity or wouldnFrank Buck-3/31/1999
1884 what do you make of this? He must see some opportunity or wouldn't be wastiSigmund-3/30/1999
1883 Contact: AccuMed International, Inc. Paul F. Lavallee (312) 642-9200 March 30,Frank Buck-3/30/1999
1882 not giving shareholders information is the norm for ACMI so no one should be suSigmund-3/9/1999
1881 <<i>The funny thing is when you look at this company, they still have Frank Buck-3/9/1999
1880 They didn't tell us what the terms of the agreement where! I believe peoplCisco-3/9/1999
1879 news but no reaction. wierd.Sigmund-3/9/1999
1878 News: biz.yahoo.com <i>AccuMed Reaches Agreement with Bell National to Cisco-3/9/1999
1877now-online.comFrank Buck-3/7/1999
1876 Ghost investors, ghost offices. Sounds like a name change is in order. AccuGhoSigmund-3/6/1999
1875 Just us ghosts! Cisco-3/6/1999
1874 Anyone here? Sigmund-3/6/1999
1873 Off subject: Test Cisco-2/25/1999
1872 If the book value of DTOX was 19 cents per share in July 1998, how much premiumCisco-2/8/1999
1871 <<<i>I have heard that the illicit opiate class drugs have made a HCisco-2/7/1999
1870 well, I didn't want to flood the market so I only sold a small part of my hSigmund-2/6/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News