Barb, the Barron's article will not be history until their libelous claims are addressed in some manner. There are still investors who won't invest in Osicom simply because they believe everything they read in a newspaper. What would Osicom's stock be worth now if the article had never been published? How many sales did Osicom lose because potential customers believed that trash? How many shareholders sold for a loss, after Barron's hatchet job?
* * *
And now, for the benefit of those who don't have enough FIBeR in their diets, I'll give the source for these "rumors" I am spreading:
My suggestion that I think we may see some news, such as a NASD National Market listing:
A meeting between Par Chadha and NASD on 1/14 was allegedly reported by BI Research. Has anyone with a real identity confirmed this yet?
messages.yahoo.com@m2.yahoo.com
My suggestion that I think we may see some news, such as GigaMux sales:
exchange2000.com
My suggestion that I think we may see some news, such as additional Net+ARM publicity:
Dow Jones has suggested the Net+ARM publicity has driven the stock's rise, as this was the latest press release from the company.
exchange2000.com
My suggestion that I think we may see some news, such as a Barron's Settlement:
Osicom sues Barron's for libel. If you own stock in Osicom, you probably already believe their side of the story, and expect that eventually Barron's will settle or Osicom will be awarded damages.
Message 2453450 |
