Did Slick Boink Monica? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Diane who wrote (849)	1/25/1998 2:27:00 PM
From: Janice Shell	Read Replies (2) of 20981

Except of course that that admission would help Jones prove a "pattern of behavior" which is exactly what her lawyers are trying to do. Yes, that's true. Though as I understand it there's a good deal of doubt whether such evidence would be considered admissable by the judge hearing the trial. He should, however, not have denied it. I think he should simply have said that his personal life was none of their business. Am not clear about whether one is required to answer ANY question at all when under oath. I would guess not, however. If that were not possible he should just have said yes. Remember, Monica hasn't charged any sort of harassment, so what "pattern of behavior" are we talking about? Seducing the help? Not a crime as long as it's consensual.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next