Did Slick Boink Monica? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: BlueCrab who wrote (2922)	1/28/1998 12:14:00 PM
From: Zoltan!	Read Replies (1) of 20981

Not true. The original tapes are legal evidence because Starr did not participate in their production. That "poison fruit" theory is not applicable. What depends is what they are admissible for and who they are admissible against. Further, Tripp cannot be charged because the MD courts have ruled that she had to know it was illegal to be prosecuted. The DA says Tripp did not and shall not be prosecuted. The FBI tapes are legal under any scenario, but again, against whom and for what purpose. As for Monica, the married teacher is valuable only to confirm Monica's allegations against "the Creep", his characterizations of her carry no weight considering his standing.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next