Did Slick Boink Monica? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: loafer who wrote (3279)	1/29/1998 11:20:00 AM
From: Janice Shell	Read Replies (3) of 20981

As I have said all along, Starr has enough physical evidence without her testimony. Now she is going down as well (again). Boy, did her attorney mess up. Starr would only have "enough evidence" if the DNA tests proved beyond any reasonable doubt that the stain on Lewinsky's dress was Clinton's semen. DNA testing takes time, and we probably won't know the results of these tests for quite awhile. Apart from that, what's he really got? Nothing, apparently. Remember: it cannot be proved that they ever had a sexual relationship unless they were caught in the act. And I very much doubt whether anyone saw them having it off. Somebody saw him kiss her, touch her? So what? That ain't sex. And if not, then he didn't commit perjury. And neither did she. She says she made up everything she told Tripp. End of story.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next