SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica?
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: jhild who wrote (3535)1/29/1998 9:26:00 PM
From: Janice Shell  Read Replies (2) of 20981
 
My understanding is that the judge allowed the case to go forward and depositions to continue, but with some restrictions, though exactly what I am uncertain.

But what exactly does this mean? If the Lewinsky material is to be--on the judge's (NOT Starr's) ruling--excluded from the Jones case, then are Clinton's and Lewinsky's depositions to be considered null and void? And so are they then--since their quondam testimony won't ever be entered in a court of law (or so I assume, as the evidence was gathered specifically for the Jones case)--off the hook as far as perjury charges are concerned?

Sounds to me as if something's gone rather badly wrong for the Jones-Lewinsky partisans.

Lawyers out there? Opinions?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News