Kirk's Market Thoughts Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Kirk's Market Thoughts

COHR 175.60

+3.0%

3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

Recommended by:

isopatch

the traveler

To: Kirk © who wrote (11496)	6/23/2021 2:33:36 AM
From: Winfastorlose	3 Recommendations Read Replies (1) of 26788

What's difficult? They have now narrowed it down to only one vaccine for children under 18 (PFE). And for kids 12 to 15, it should only be given to those in a "high risk" category. This is a reversal from their previous recommendations. What is high risk, by the way when the survival rate for kids under 15 is 99.9999%? All of the "pro vaxxers" on an experimental gene therapy treatment that has NOT been tested for long term safety are insane in my opinion when it is becoming obvious that there are effective alternative treatments available that do not carry the inordinate risk the so called "vaccines" do. The only way the mRNA gene therapy treatments received their EUAs was by claiming HCQ and Ivermectin were dangerous and did not work. EUAs can only be granted if there are no other treatments. New studies have now been completed which have completely debunked the claims of lack of efficacy and safety of HCQ and Ivermectin. The FDA advised last week that no more new EUAs would be granted for Covid 19 and that in the future the safety tests must be completed and standard testing protocols must be followed.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next