Kirk I don't disagree that we need to protect our population but I strongly disagree that the mRNA vaccines are the way to do it. Unfortunately the federal bureaucracies (FDA/NIH/CDC) charged with our safety have been politicized by the press and progressives and also corrupted by Big Pharma funding and FUD-ing. Their minds are totally closed and, worse yet, they are intentionally suppressing valid research and results about other viable alternatives.
In my opinion (and like you I'm an EE and not an MD), there are better and much less expensive solutions than vaccines with an unproven, untested technology. Ivermectin would protect more people, more safely, faster and at much less cost (pennies!) than the vaccine strategy we've been led to believe is the only solution. And Ivermectin is only one of several good alternatives (Hydroxychloroquine+zinc, Quercetin+zinc, high vitamin D, adequate selenium, etc being others).
I truly believe the powers behind the current vaccine strategy have the blood of millions on their hands. Had they simply listened the evidence that was available over a year ago, we would be in a much better place today, both health-wise and economically. Instead they actively suppressed it. I expect the full truth will eventually come out as the information dam is already developing cracks as we speak.
And BTW I could almost rewrite my comments about the corruption of our country by the recent election fraud and coverup, but that's another story. |
