SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Kirk's Market Thoughts
COHR 198.51+0.4%Dec 11 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Kirk © who wrote (12250)10/26/2021 4:58:23 PM
From: Elroy  Read Replies (1) of 26763
 
CA has a 13.3% income tax on those who make $1M a year...

And the reason people who make $1M per year in income and $10M per year in unrealized capital gains should pay $133,000 income taxes and zero in unrealized capital gains income tax is.......what?

Because as the previous poster mentioned, people in that situation often end up quitting their $1M per year job, thus paying zero future income taxes, and live off of the $10M per year of tax free unrealized capital gains.

More power to those smart and fortunate enough to accumulate investments that produce that type of capital gain.....but why let it be sheltered from tax while working people income pay when the worker's salary is orders of magnitude less than the investor's unrealized capital gain?

What's the logical reason why realizing a gain should trigger a tax penalty, while not realizing a gain gets rewarded relatively with zero tax penalty?

The lucky few who are able to own investments which increase to the hundreds of millions are able to never sell the asset, live off of a 2% per annum ever expanding bank loan secured by the hundreds of millions in assets, and never pay taxes because they never need to realize the capital gain.

Why discourage realizing gains?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext