Did Slick Boink Monica? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Lady Lurksalot who wrote (5079)	2/7/1998 1:54:00 AM
From: greenspirit	Read Replies (2) of 20981

Holly, res-<< In the case as presented so far, I think at best it is dirty pool to subpoena Betty Currie's testimony and smacks of a blatantly blind fishing expedition.>> You or I have really no idea what the case as presented so far is. Don't forget Janet Reno and three judges voted to allow Kenneth Star to broaden his investigation into these area's. They must have cast their vote on a reasonable belief of potential criminal activity. I for one trust the judgement of four people who are tasked with upholding the law. They had nothing to gain one way or the other by the outcome. Other than to find the truth. Betty Currie is a part of this investigation. She may hold key evidence one way or the other. Her testifying is not dirty pool in any way. It's simply part of Kenneth Starr's method of arriving at the truth. The truth should be the overriding concern. Not some fictional secretary to boss priviledge. Michael

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next