SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lady Lurksalot who wrote (5106)2/7/1998 2:58:00 AM
From: ViperChick Secret Agent 006.9  Read Replies (2) of 20981
 


I don't see how you could infer that I am "vilifying" Betty Currie "because she is a
secretary," nor am I "upholding her" to anything!


you need to follow the leap in logic....not because she is a secretary in and of itself... but because she is a secretary and not following your standards and yes you are upholding her to a standard...

do these words ring a bell?????

"Mrs.
Currie is in the wrong to have acted unilaterally--subpoened or not."
"Another BTW: By definition, secretary means keeper of secrets. Does anyone see
anything even remotely askew with Betty Currie being referred to as Clinton's
secretary? Clinton--right or wrong, guilty or innocent of whatever--Betty Currie is, to
my way of thinking, an utter disgrace to a time-honored profession."


and follow one more leap of logic to the point you keep making that a secretary should get AT LEAST the same kind of exemption as attorney/client..and it is obvious you think it should be even more
thus my comment about the attorney/client standard in my post

as far as "material" goes...yes there is information in the New York Times article that is in fact material....the question is whether the information is true and that is decided in a court of law. If it were in a court of law an objection as to immateriality would more than likely be overruled.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext