Christine,
You write, "who do not ascribe to your implied code of amorality and evading truthful testimony."
You have again MISINTERPRETED and MISQUOTED and ASCRIBED to me thoughts and words which ARE NOT MINE, as you have repeatedly done in the past, and I believe intentionally so. This seems to be a pattern with you, Christine, and one which I personally find very unattractive.
Were it not for the above-captioned sentence, TAKEN OUT OF ITS ORIGINAL CONTEXT, and thereby wrongly attributing to me something I DID NOT SAY AND DO NOT BELIEVE, I would not have even bothered to respond and dignify your remarks.
Christine, If you are somehow getting an inkling that I may be very angry with you about now, you just might be getting an inkling.
My apologies to the rest of the thread, but I could not allow this misinformation (a euphemism) go unchallenged. Also I apologize for my liberal use of CAPS LOCK in a post with no headline.
Holly |
