From a FOX station here in the Bay Area Hmmm, does that mean it's just right of extreme left? LOL
Seriously, here's a little different perspective on that "study":
theepochtimes.com
Whatever your perspective, I think it's clear there's extreme publication bias occurring these days, and many authors have noted that if you try to publish anything scientific that goes against the accepted mainstream views, that you just can't get published. We're not talking about a fair peer-review process here, which is healthy and needed. If that were the case, the authors wouldn't have a problem getting answers for why their publications were pulled/refused, but that's not what's been happening.
Take a look at this article, and among the other revelations, which are really nothing new to anyone who's been keeping themselves informed, it's pretty easy to miss the fact that even a Clinical Director at the NIH can't even get published when he attempts to submit data that's damaging to the pro-vaccine agenda.
theepochtimes.com
It's also not surprising that the CDC and FDA have come out against Ivermectin and other therapeutics that don't bring them any money. This FDA official explains their vested interest quite well in this Project Veritas expose:
projectveritas.com
So why should anyone believe what the CDC or FDA say anymore? And apparently, the majority no longer do, as the % of Americans who feel that way has dropped from 69% to 44% since the pandemic started, according to NBC news poll (see p. 17 of link below). I'd say that's more than well-deserved, and should be even lower in my opinion.
s3.documentcloud.org |
