|
Garvin, have you even considered the material in the posts I've provided or have you convinced yourself that chiming in with these petty attacks is your only option? Again, I understand your motivation but please be aware it's a poor man's defense and it achieves nothing save some obscure sense of satisfaction for those who engage in it. Ironically confusion and obfuscation has been the stock's best friend whereas clarity, crystal or otherwise, has worked against it. The reason is quite simple: the revelation that BT offers nothing new, save a few discretionary conveniences to roaming employees, isn't well received by shareholders -- precisely the reception BT received during trial installations. Moreover, it's clear that the external workforce, in contrast to the roaming workforce, is best served by ISDN-based products which RACE is apparently targeting. There are dozens of products in that space so RACE's johnny-come-lately entry will have little impact. In addition, products like Dialogic's CT Connect are increasing in popularity and they allow virtually any corporate telephone system to hook into the corporate LAN. Once that bridge has been established, it makes sense to route voice communications through the LAN. Finally, Intel, Microsoft are driving a standard solution for the integration of voice and data and corporate IT managers see the writing on the wall. What do you see Garvin? You see that now is the time to spew and hurl at those who would dare make such observations. Not having any understanding whatsoever about this product or the application space it purports to serve can only generate more frustration on your part. That frustration is evident in your posts and I would prescribe the following remedy: get a mutual funds, I mean that sincerely, and stay away from individual stocks -- especially technology stocks. |
