Did Slick Boink Monica? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Big D who wrote (5391)	2/8/1998 6:21:00 PM
From: Janice Shell	of 20981

One, well, I'm still undecided. Two and three: I don't believe he should ever have been called to testify about his sex life except as it specifically concerned Paula Jones. I don't believe the public (or the law) has the right to know anything more unless another woman wishes to press harassment charges. As someone remarked much earlier, these days sexual harassment seems to be whatever the woman wants it to be. We need a better law. If he lied about whether he'd had it off with Monica when giving his deposition, I frankly don't think it's especially serious. As has often been noted in the press, it is very very unusual for anyone to be prosecuted for perjured testimony given in a civil case. If, however, he suborned perjury, I'm afraid that's a graver matter. Though I very much doubt Starr'll ever be able to get the goods on him even if he did. As I've said before, in my view he should simply refused to testify about Lewinsky or any women except Jones. What would they have done? Thrown him in jail for contempt of court? I very much doubt it.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next