Re <<Cleverly … deciding>>
I am guessing that choosing is a good thing, for it indicates one is stance-ed to and have both capability and capacity to choose, and hopefully wisely, without hashing it or waffling, and certainly without having to do rug-pull on family and friends.
I am also suspecting that before choosing, best to have enough ammunition to back up the choice.
Message 34275559
"We Simply Don't Have The Ammo" - Polish General Says Can No Longer Supply Ukraine, Warns Russia Has Resources To Continue War
OTOH, we are told Russia expected a short war, a cake-walk, after which cooler minds prevail and some negotiated settlement gets done. The negotiation would successfully give rise to new European continent security architecture.
OTOH, we were told that Russia would lose, badly, after running dry of ammo and tanks, unclear which first, and give rise to a new European security architecture.
OTTH, we are now told, “not enough ammunition … to win!”
… and not only ammo, but tanks, airplanes, anti-air gear, cheap energy, soldiers, eggs, chickens, … and the list goes on and on, and oh, factories.
A lot of people paid a lot of money over a long period of time to get us to the present spot. I do not know what spot we are on, but I am seriously puzzled as to where the money went?
Am open minded but under the circumstances unclear to me how good an idea it is to do a two, three, or still-more front war, be it / they a Big-arrow Big War or a lot of smaller war-lettes
Am only sure of one thing, that the Russians and Poles and Lithuanians, Latvians, Estonians, … and a few others, including DNC and RNC, really not cotton to each other, answering the question, “can we not all just get along?” |
