| | | hello C2,
Re <<Resentment of foreign influences, some of which is justified; an exceedingly powerful single party synonymous (and constitutionally aligned) with the State; a single man who becomes the epicenter of political life; a well-developed and overwhelming internal security apparatus; xenophobia; the rapid development of military power; the integration and coordination of the State with economic activity; an aggressive foreign policy; weak and fractured but nonetheless significant foreign opponents; demographic issues; etc.
Question: When did we see this set of circumstances in the 20th Century? Are we seeing them happen under our noses now? What do they lead to?
God help us.
Yes, China fits the bill for all of the listed factors, but we don’t live in the 20th Century.
China has a big data and a machine intelligence economy supporting autocracy. Is cyber authoritarianism compatible with success? Do the listed factors matter? Is it going to be different this time?
Or does history repeat itself?>>
the view from this side of the pond is that ...
(1) there is far less resentment of foreign influences in China than, say, in USA, at this juncture
(2) powerful single but useful party might be an advantage to powerful nut use-less uni-party, at this juncture
(3) as to well-developed and overwhelming security apparatus I need not to say much, especially now, at this juncture
(4) xenophobia, at this juncture, imagined by MSM but not reflecting the truth, at least re China
(5) commented on demographic non-issues before Message 34373806
it is possible that the conflict is less about autocracy vs democracy especially as efficacious autocracy vs imaginary democracy, but about rejuvenated civilisation states vs return to decline civilisation states
dunno ... agnostic ... let us continue to watch the play by play
one note, certainly getting exciting by the play, at the moment :0)
I understand where your questions are coming from because I know what MSM have been saying, but I am suspecting and with good reasons, that the MSM narration is wrong to very extremely wrong, for top of the mind be that Xi wakes up in the morning, along with the rest of the technocracy, and asks, "how do I expand the middle class" and does.
Unclear to me what DC is trying to do.
 |
|
