SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Kirk's Market Thoughts
COHR 159.83+18.7%2:50 PM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: sandeep who wrote (22881)2/2/2025 6:18:32 AM
From: Augustus Gloop2 Recommendations

Recommended By
#Breeze
Hank Scorpio

  Read Replies (2) of 26430
 
I was hesitant to respond to your post because I don't want to debate politics. You must have missed the <g> at the end of my post. You're a decent guy but your political posts are about Trump are based on emotion.

To your point about Canada making the US "liberal"
  • Canada has a population of roughly 40 million
  • Roughly 17 million people voted in '21 and not all of them are liberal (source - elections Canada). They wouldn't be a single state - their provinces would become states. That would not tilt our elections.
We will not invade or assimilate Canada against their will. However, the discussion about a merger between the two countries has been tabled and should be discussed. It makes sense for a variety of reasons.
  • Cultural similarities make it the best merger opportunity on earth
  • They have an abundance of natural resources that they lack the funds and manpower to extract.
  • North America would control almost 30% of the global fresh water supply.
  • The United states does more GDP in 1 months than Canada does in a year.
  • We already protect them so fortifying the additional border would come at minimal cost.
  • The alternative is protecting a 5000 mile leaky border that we share. <----why do that when we can tighten the entire continent.
  • These people would prosper and be safer by being part of the United States. The location is outstanding for military purposes
  • North America would control almost 30% of the global fresh water supply.
  • They've become a leaky ship where it comes to Chinese imports, drugs and the Chinese population explosion are just a few of the issues. Those issues eventually trickle down to the United States. <--- That may be the single biggest reason for the tariffs. We can put an end to that and everyone will be better for it.
Greenland Makes sense for many of the same reasons.
  • We already patrol and protect them so the defense cost is minimal.
  • They have 50,000 residents that we can easily absorb in out social security system
  • It's a treasure trove of minerals that can't be accessed and worked with their population.
  • These people would prosper and be safer by being part of the United States. The location is outstanding for military purposes
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News