SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Kirk's Market Thoughts
COHR 191.04-2.5%Jan 16 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
Recommended by:
John Koligman
sandeep
To: CrashDavis who wrote (23039)2/3/2025 10:43:35 PM
From: Augustus Gloop2 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) of 27067
 
Oh hell - nobody is going to answer my question so I will.

The answer is Yes! We (The United States & Russia) agreed to protect Ukraine in exchange for those nukes because we both viewed a nuclear Ukraine as a threat - and it was.

So here's my point - Russia knew there were people in the "dumb@$$" region that spoke Russian back then. They knew Crimea would be part of Ukraine back then and they still made the agreement.

The only thing that has changed is Putin. So we have a guy shorter than Tom Cruise disrupting things because he's not happy about an agreement that took place 30 years ago - before he was in power.

Does he want Alaska back too?

I hate Russia and that will never go away. I hate China and that will never go away either
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext