SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : CFZ E-Wiggle Workspace

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: ajtj99 who wrote (40981)4/25/2025 7:07:10 AM
From: skinowski  Read Replies (1) of 41420
 
To be fair, Greenfield (as I recall) talks about massive exports from Britain to the US - which the Brits, being at that time more skillful and more technologically advanced - could produce far less expensively. I doubt that they did it with the purpose of not allowing the US to develop. Most likely, those British companies simply wanted to make money.

I don’t think it’s fair to call it “dumping” - but, the effect was similar. And, the tariffs helped the American domestic economy to develop. It seems that the analogy, in broad terms, has validity.

There is this old joke about Psychiatrists. “Question: How many Psychiatrists does it take to change a light bulb? Answer: One -- BUT, the bulb must WANT to change”.

Same thing here. The new protectionist tariffs will, likely, give our economy a chance to catch up. But, will our business people use this chance - or, will they just enjoy the opportunity to charge more for the same old mousetraps? This, remains to be seen.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext