Holly, okay, so let's just say (of course, we have no way of knowing) that Monica fantasized the sexual part of her obviously close relationship with Pres. Clinton. Let's say she's medicallly afflicted with "these types of pathologies, and they are by no means rare."
Well then that would conflict with "Most, if not all of the women who have claimed to have had affairs with Presidents and other dignitaries have done quite well with their book royalties and were largely unknown in the mainstream prior to making the rounds of the the literary cocktail circuit and talk shows. I'm sure Monica and other pretenders (if such they be) are acutely aware of this tried and traveled shortcut to fame and fortune."
Which is it? Was the "fantasy" a deliberate act, a "shortcut to fame and fortune", or is she a mentally disturbed woman who happens to have government security clearance, and used to work (maybe still does) at the office of Public Affairs at the Pentagon? Which story do you believe, Holly? Or does it matter, as long as she is viewed as innocent of the charge of perjury? Is that it, that any story the public is willing to soak up is okay, as long as Bill is protected? Why do I feel ill.
DK |
