SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Young and Older Folk Portfolio

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: jritz0 who wrote (21330)10/16/2025 9:05:19 AM
From: mykesc20204 Recommendations

Recommended By
chowder
jritz0
livwell
Tam3262

  Read Replies (1) of 22502
 
RE: "It seems to me that someone is pigeonholing (Perhaps) when the criteria of a stock selection have to meet 5%, 5%, there are not a lot of investable companies that pay that (No doubt, based on my limited research so far)."

I already own QQQI, SPYI, QYLD, PFFA, a basket of CEFs and a basket of BDCs, so I have that area covered I think and use that income as you suggest: "Someone could live on 5-8% and reinvest the remaining 4-7% to insure they are buying more income"

I mentioned that when I sold KMB I really did have a replacement yet. But the replacement will need to be a dividend growth company because at the core, that is what I am and will remain. Sure, I dabble on the fringes with income only HY stuff, and I am expanding that, but I am most comfortable with a single company with a rich history of shareholder friendliness by way of paying a reliable, increasing dividend.

My initial thoughts on the subject were as simple as "let's see if I can find better prospective company than KMB". I dont know why you would think your comment would piss anyone off? We are all here just seeking to bounce ideas off each other and/or share our moves and why we made those.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext