jhild, by attacking Starr, the Clinton administration is obstructing justice, pure and simple. By the way, it has been admitted by one source on a morning TV talk show that one leak concerning the Starr grand jury testimony came from "sources close to the President's defense". Remember that, through joint agreements, the Clinton attorneys have access to the testimony given, and in fact Clinton attorneys helped for instance Betty Currie obtain an attorney for herself.
It's obvious to me that, in order to stir up trouble and to make Starr look bad, the Clinton attorneys are leaking grand jury testimony, then loudly and acrimoniously blaming it on Starr, in order to damage his reputation.
This is out-of-control and an obstruction of justice, but what's new? What's more, the mainstream press is playing along with the game, as usual. What's ironic is that the press knows who their confidential sources are, and yet they won't ever say who the sources are, or even which side is leaking the testimony, if either. The witnesses themselves may be calling the TV shows. They [the media] look to me to be guilty of a vast conspiracy to obstruct justice, and should be prosecuted.
DK |
