Christine, that's a very good description of what's really going on at the White House:
the strategy of the White House is to CHANGE THE SUBJECT, to distract the American people from what is actually going on. This is a fairly widespread legal tactic, practiced when the defense wants to create a distraction because the accused may well be guilty.
Pioneered, or at least publicly fine-tuned by O.J. Simpson's defense attorneys. That the President's attorneys would be utilizing the same strategy used by attorneys for a man accused of a double homicide knife slaying is really incredible. It shows just how desperate the Clinton administration is.
BTW Christine, have you or anyone else thought it curious that since, in the Clinton administration's eyes Ken Starr is totally unfit to undertake this investigation, WHY has nobody in the Clinton administration called on Starr's boss Janet Reno to take Starr off the case? Hmmmm? The reason, IMO, is because they know that even if Reno did that, she would have to appoint someone else, who would simply trudge onward through the fact finding process. They know that the "attack the investigator" strategy might be seen as wearing a little thin the second time around, so I would think that the Clinton's actually would rather have Starr kept on the case.
Maybe Clinton could fire Janet Reno, and see how that plays in Peoria, hmmmm??
DK |