SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica?
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Janice Shell who wrote (8444)2/26/1998 3:25:00 PM
From: Fangorn  Read Replies (1) of 20981
 
Janice,

>"This office has received repeated press inquiries indicating that
misinformation is being spread about personnel involved in this
investigation," Starr said in a statement. "We are using traditional and
appropriate techniques to find out who is responsible and whether their
actions are intended to intimidate prosecutors and investigators,
impede the work of the grand jury, or otherwise obstruct justice."
Federal law makes it a crime for someone "by any threatening
letter or communication" to "influence, intimidate or impede" a member
of a grand jury, a prosecutor or certain other officials.<

Everything else in this article is spin put out by Clintonistas to obscure the very clear reason why Starr did and should have Blumenthal subpoenaed. Starr isn't after anyone for telling unpleasant truths but is after anyone spreading lies about his staff in an effort to intimidate them.

Now stick your head back in the sand and pretend you voted for an honest ethical man...twice!!!
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News