Did Slick Boink Monica? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Janice Shell who wrote (8603)	2/26/1998 7:17:00 PM
From: Dwight E. Karlsen	Read Replies (2) of 20981

Maybe I'll take a scroll through there later, but I'm still wondering why this Judge decided to reverse herself. And why, pray tell, in the Sexual Harassment case of the good ol' boy Senator Packwood, a literal laundry list of women was indeed ruled quite appropriate to show "a pattern of conduct." If you will recall, Packwood's diaries were subpoened, and a little black book of various womens' sordid confessions was meticulously maintained by Packwood's chief accusers back in Washington DC. Mind you, these confessions were actively and publicly solicited by Packwood's accusers! This was also ruled "very relevant" and admissible. But oops, I forgot that Packwood was a Republican! And Clinton is a Democrat. So, it's all very different now. I still recall the testimony of how Packwood did a woman right on his office floor, and this was consensual sex, yet deemed relevant. Where was your's and other's indignation about private sex lives then??? DK

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next